a reference, not a listicle

For each job, which AI actually wins

We compute each ranking from stated criteria and print the arithmetic on the same page. A number with no source does not get printed, and every page carries its own last-checked date.

  • computed, not opinionated
  • every number sourced and dated
  • an access-from-Iran column

What do you want the AI to do

Each job has a ranking table whose criteria and weights are written on the page.

Studying and learning The tool that turns your own material into something you can review, not an answer you only read. Current pick Gemini Notebook Video generation The model that gives you longer, cleaner video with more references in a single generation. Current pick Seedance 2.5 Coding The model that writes better code, from the web-dev leaderboard and the real price. Current pick Claude Opus 5

Why these pages differ from the other lists

The arithmetic is on the page

Each job has its own criteria, each criterion a weight, and every weight is visible. Change a weight and the table recomputes. There is no "manual position" field in this section at all, so no ranking can move without a visible reason.

We write down what we do not know

If we could not verify a number from the vendor or from the benchmark own leaderboard, the cell stays empty and says "not verified". Scoring zero and being unverified are two different things, and they stay two different things in the table.

A column only we can write

For every tool we write whether it is reachable from Iran, whether a card works, and if not, what actually works instead. We check it ourselves from an Iranian connection and print the date we checked.

One page, four languages

Every page exists in Persian, English, Arabic and Turkish, and each language is written rather than translated. The facts and the numbers are identical across the four; the sentences are not.

The makers

Each maker has three axes: the products you sign in to, the model families, and the versions.

Anthropic The maker of Claude. Today the strongest pick for coding and long-running agents. Google The widest catalogue on the market. The only maker shipping in all six categories.

Latest changes

  • The video category went live with four models and it ranks versions rather than products, because one model is resold across several tools. Weights: clip length 30, resolution 25, reference inputs 20, scene control 15, Iran 10. Seedance 2.5 came first. Generation time is not a criterion because no vendor publishes it, and neither is price, because Kling is absent from the only dollar-denominated list there is.
  • Seedance 2.5 was recorded: up to 30 seconds in one generation and up to 50 reference inputs, being 30 images, 10 videos and 10 audio clips. The thing the product page omits and the API docs state: this model resolution ceiling is 720p, where Seedance 2.0 went to 4K.
  • Kling VIDEO 3.0 was recorded: three to fifteen seconds, native 4K since 23 April, and native audio in five speech languages. Persian is not one of the five, which for a Persian reader is the most important fact on the page.
  • The Kling page was written. Five plans with prices from their own credit guide, plus the point that the advertised prices are first-subscription prices: Standard costs $6.99 and renews at $8.80.

What changed

A blunt word about this page

We built this because our own clients keep asking which tool to buy for a given job, and the answer changes every quarter. So the rankings here are temporary, and that is correct: any new release can move the table.

What you will not find here is an account for sale. We sell no subscriptions and no placement in any table. If something needs doing with these tools, the service for it is on the site and says so plainly.