Pro tool

Site Keywords yours or a competitor

Give it a domain and see the keywords Google considers relevant to it based on the content of its pages, each with search volume, CPC and advertising competition.

  • Works on Persian domains
  • Volume and CPC per keyword
  • Reads competitor strategy

Run the tool right here

See which keywords a competitor built content around, and how much each one is searched.

  • What it costs $0.18
  • Data source DataForSEO

A Persian keyword is checked with no country filter whatever you pick here, because Google does not publish Iran separately and a country filter does not sharpen the Persian number, it splits it (an Iranian user behind a VPN is counted in Germany or Turkey). This field only applies to non-Persian keywords, where it returns data for exactly that country. The price is flat and identical in both modes.

We buy this tool's data from a provider, so every run costs us real money and we cannot leave it open to guests. Registration is free and there is no monthly subscription: you top up a wallet and only pay for the runs you actually need. Already registered? Sign in

The short answer

This tool says what a site has content about, not what it ranks for. That distinction matters and is where most misunderstandings begin: the list you get is that site topical map, not its report card.

That is exactly why, unlike competitor keywords, this tool works for Persian domains too. It is based on the content of the pages themselves rather than positions in a particular market, so it does not depend on country data coverage. For the Iranian market that makes it one of the few quick ways to understand what topic a Persian-language competitor revolves around.

The use that gets less thought is entering your own domain. The list that comes back tells you what Google thinks your site is about, and that almost always differs from what you think. If you run a home appliance shop and the list is full of unrelated blog keywords, your site is not giving Google a clear topical signal.

A good way to work with the output is to put the list next to a competitor list and look for the gap. Keywords in their list and not in yours are the topics they have covered and you have not. That difference list turns directly into a content calendar with no guessing needed.

Where the data comes from

Google Ads keywords for site. Important: this is not "what the site ranks for", it is "what the site has content about". For actual rankings use the rank checker or competitor keywords. For Persian it runs without a country filter, like the rest of this family.

When it helps

When you want to understand a competitor's content strategy in minutes, or to see what Google thinks your own site is about.

Where it does not help

The most important thing to know does not fit in the tool name: this list is not rankings. None of the rows says that site is visible for that keyword in Google; it only says its content is relevant to that keyword. A site can have a hundred keywords in this list and be on the first page for none of them. For real positions, the rank checker, competitor keywords or the full Google results are the right instruments, not this one. The second limitation is accuracy: relevance detection is machine made, and on sites whose subject is scattered the result fills with unrelated keywords. That is itself a finding, but only if you know what you are looking at.

One thing we learned using it

The best use we have got from this tool in practice is running it on the client own domain before any strategy meeting. The list that comes back usually shows the site talking about three or four different things while the owner believes it talks about one. That gap is the right starting point for the conversation, and it moves the discussion from taste to data.

What it costs

Price per run $0.18

No monthly subscription. You top up a wallet and the price of a run is printed on the button before you press it; if you never run it, nothing is deducted.

Questions about this tool

Does this mean the competitor ranks for these keywords?

No. The list says their content is relevant to these keywords, not that they are visible for them. For real positions, put the same keywords into the full Google results and see where they stand on the page.

Does it work for .ir domains?

Yes, and that is one of its important differences from competitor keywords. Because it is based on page content rather than positions in a particular market, it does not depend on country data coverage.

The output is full of irrelevant keywords, what is wrong?

Usually the site itself. If a domain has content about several unrelated subjects, relevance detection scatters too. That is itself a result worth seeing: it means the site topical signal is not clear.